In the last three years, I have purchased a number of the MBI Railroad Color History books. The photography in all of them is quite good, but as a writer, I’m probably more hypercritical of the writing in them than most.
There are two volumes that I found very disappointing. Compared to other volumes, I wonder how Motorbooks/Voyageur Press let them slip through.
The first is Peter Lynch’s Penn Central. Lynch almost completely ignores the mistakes and operations that ultimately doomed the railroad, writing that it had been covered elsewhere. I can only think of the Wreck of the Penn Central, which is several decades old.
The second is the recent Chessie System by Dave Ori. Ori only briefly glances over why the C&O, B&O, and WM branded themselves as Chessie. He does not discuss how the parent holding company allocated equipment to each railroad. He also totally ignores how Chessie was folded into CSX. Yes, there is a separate MBI volume on CSX, but this seems a bad oversight on Ori’s part.
Instead, both Lynch and Ori spend most of their books going over the routes of both railroads, mind-numbingly listing every division, city, waypoint, and yard. I realize that a modeler or a really anal historian might be interested, but to me, it’s as exciting as reading the phone book.
I ended up being disappointed at the money I spent on both volumes and the lack of knowledge I gained about the railroads’ histories and rolling stock.
The template for this series is Brian Solomon’s Amtrak, which succinctly describes the history, rolling stock, and operations of the NRPC. Karl Zimmerman’s Burlington Zephyrs (in the related Great Passenger Trains series) was another excellent volume.
Yet it seems that for some authors in the series, photos are no problem, but filling pages is.
Thoughts?