Just because something’s available for a download doesn’t mean there’s no distribution cost.
Web hosting, the web design team, the % of every sale taken by the credit card companies, etc all have an impact on the price of a product. Add that to whatever the production cost is for the product, then you can get some idea as to what’s a viable price. It’s easy to say that the hard drive space is paid for, once they own it. But it’s not. They have to provide for disaster recovery, security, backups, etc. which all cost money.
Plus, the space itself has a value. A straight pdf file (text and pictures) may sell for $10-12 and take up less than 1/2 the space of a video pdf that sells for $6. So from a straight profitability standpoint, the regular pdfs could be considerably more profitable. Add that to the cost of the bandwidth use for downloading the larger files and that also affects the value of the video pdfs to Kalmbach.
Another factor when these items are priced is the fact that they carry no advertising. I would assume that the bulk of the costs for the print magazine are covered by advertising, and the cover price/subscription prices are calculated to provide the income needed to cover the remaining production costs, plus a make a profit.
The purpose for any company’s existance is to make a profit. I would guess that if the actual costs were tabulated for the production and sales of the internet downloads, that the actual profit would be minimal, if they have shown any profit at all.
Of course, you’re still welcome to decide if it’s worth the money. But ultimately it doesn’t matter how they derive their price, or even how much profit they are making. The only real question is if you think the product is of enough value to you to spend $6.00.
Kalmbach has to decide, based on their sales, if the price is too high. But if lowering the price makes it unprofitable, then they may just decide that it’s not a viable product and drop th