Ah, yes, and in Great Britain, whom we call an engineer is called a driver. Interurbans and streetcars had motormen and conductors, in the two-man days, and public continued to call them motormen in many cases, even after one-mann operation began. Most transit systems went to one-man operation in stages, so they had motormen, conductors, and operators, the latter the people running the one-man cars, but the name operator never caught on with the public. While driver was reserved for those operating the buses. And nearly all street railway and interuban companies did have bus subsidiaries.
In response to an earlier critique. I never heard anyone going to the elevated lines used by the 1, 2, 4, 5 (including Dyar Avenue line) 7, or J say they were going to the "elevated. “L,” or “El.” Only “subway.” Even thought they were about to climb up staris instead of down. As far as the B, D, F, and Q in Brooklyn, again it was “the train,” not subway or elevated. I now understand it still is.
And soutbound Yonkers 1, 2, and 3, streetcars (Third Avenue system pale yellow and bright red trolleycars) had SUBWAY as the destination sign, even thourgh they would reverse direction under, not over, the 242nd Street and Broadway station, definitely an elevated station. And the exact same destination sign was used for a different destination, refering to the 241st Street and White Plains Avenue station, also elevated, for southbound cars from New Rochelle on the A line “interurban” streetcar. (New Rochelle, Pelham, Mount Vernon, The Bronx). The exception is the M line in Brooklyn, where people do refer to “the elevated” because the elevated structure used by that line on Myrtle Avenue is not used by any other route, the whole route in Brooklyn is elevated, and (most important), until ab