I never would have thought there were so many words related to bridges:
http://sdrc.lib.uiowa.edu/eng/bridges/WaddellGlossary/GlossS.htm
Shoe: “That part or detail of a span which transfers the load from the end pin to the bearing plate or to the intervening rollers.”
Since every bridge must have something to do that transfer, every bridge will have bridge shoes.
Bridge shoes also have a corollary task: they have to account for the different expansions, both thermal and physical, of the bridge and the ground underneath. Thus they must allow for movement.
On a large bridge, this will be the bridge shoes that are so obvious and are somewhat illustrated by the Micro Engineering ones. I say somewhat, because they are only selling the “anchored” type. There is also the “non-anchored” type. This is to allow for the movement mentioned above.
While the anchored type will commonly have the pin connection shown in the Micro Engineering sample, the other one will have rollers. This is “non-anchored”, and where there will be movement.
If both ends were anchored, the bridge would fail.
I suppose there could be bridge shoes that would practically be invisible, and appear not to be there at all. They would dispense with the rollers, and just go with sliding. Thus there would only be a steel plate on top of another steel plate. Horizontal alignment would have to be allowed for, though. If someone can come up with pictures, I’d sure like to see this. There ARE some short girder railroad bridges, maybe 20’, that might be done that way. Seems like the plates would have to be lubricated, REGULARLY.
To model the apparently unavailable rolling shoe, you can modify the pin type by cutting the pin secti