Just caught this on the news. It seems that there may be hope for economical travel here after all. I know I would use it to get ot Laramie to see the Pokes play.
From the Casper Star Tribune:
Just caught this on the news. It seems that there may be hope for economical travel here after all. I know I would use it to get ot Laramie to see the Pokes play.
From the Casper Star Tribune:
Here in North Carolina, the State DOT has partnered with Amtrak to increase the number of trains serving our cities. One of the trains is, in fact, owned by NCDOT.
http://www.bytrain.org/passenger/
And how much will that cost me as a taxpayer in a different part of the country that will never have a use for it? What’s another trillion dollars here or there? Soon the new simpler tax form will be, “how much did you make last year? Send it.”
[tup] Thats Great but i am confused. Does that mean Amtrak will reroute the Zepher Away from the current route west out of Denver? Or are they considering a completley different train from Cheyenne to Sa;t Lake City? As an employee of Union Pacific I cant see the U.P. wanting this train on the main Line Just a thought Larry
Larry, what they’re talking about is additional service (Zephyr would be unaffected) from Seattle via UP to either Salt Lake City or (what Wyoming prefers) Denver, via Cheyenne. I know I’d prefer a separate train all the way to Chicago, but I’m with you–I don’t see the UP exactly bending over backwards to accommodate any of it.
The linked article states that the Seattle-Cheyenne-Denver route is the same that Amtrak’s Pioneer ran on from 1991-1997, when it was discontinued. Back then I was hoping to schedule a trip out west to ride it in the near future, but a bunch of things happened to postpone that - and then it was withdrawn.
Previously, the Pioneer had run on a different route from its inception in 1977 until 1991 - would that have been the Salt Lake City route instead ?
Three concepts have been floated:
RWM
(1) The great god Omaha is gonna get his armour yellow shorts all in a bunch.
(2) As long as they’re gonna gonna screw things up; why not keep going? Add Denver-Colorado Springs-Pueblo-Trinidad-Raton-Albuquerque-El Paso to the train and piss-off the other Class 1?
back in 1995 or 1996, my wife and I booked a return trip on the Empire Builder Chicago-Seattle. A few weeks after booking, we received a call from Amtrak asking if we would consider our return leg on the Pioneer. Same fare. Would arrive in Chicago in time to catch the Capitol to Washington. Was a great trip. Just wondering how many other similar phone calls Amtrak made to boost ridership on the Pioneer,
The idea of the DOT contributing to costs might work here. Also if there were a way to work out a package deal to buy UW Sports tickets and Amtrak tickets to get there that would definitely boost ridership especially for the winter seasons. Maybe this is something that I will begin speaking to my officals about.
I would like to see Twincities/Omaha/KansasCity/Dallas/Fort Worth sernice There has been talk of Chicago /DesMoines and Omaha sevice been looked into on the Iowa Interstate railroad, but this only a pipe dream I am sure. But knowing the managment of our employer Carl, Jeff and I know that the Union Pacific will never allow Amtrak across Iowa or anywhere else if they have their way, and its their railroad so you know how that will come out Larry
Previously, the Pioneer had run on a different route from its inception in 1977 until 1991 - would that have been the Salt Lake City route instead ?
The original Pioneer route was Salt Lake City-Pocatello-Portland-Seattle; my wife and I made a round trip trip SLC-Portland in 1979. I don’t remember the exact dates of the changes, but in 1982 the route was Seattle-Ogden (where it was combined with the California Zephyr and the Desert Wind), and the combined train went to Chicago via Borie and Denver. After the Rio Grande quit operating the Rio Grande Zephyr in 1983, the trains were combined in Salt Lake City, and this held until 1991.
Johnny
And how much will that cost me as a taxpayer in a different part of the country that will never have a use for it? What’s another trillion dollars here or there? Soon the new simpler tax form will be, “how much did you make last year? Send it.”
About the same as it will cost me, a taxpayer living in a state with no Amtrak at all, and probably less than it will cost me to help fund interstate highways in your state that I may never have a use for.
The idea of the DOT contributing to costs might work here. Also if there were a way to work out a package deal to buy UW Sports tickets and Amtrak tickets to get there that would definitely boost ridership especially for the winter seasons. Maybe this is something that I will begin speaking to my officals about.
I have never heard of Amtrak being involved in such a bundling, but our light rail and bus system does it from time to time with events in city center.
What happened here is that some Congresscreature snuck an earmark into legislation that commanded Amtrak to make this study, so Amtrak is doing as it is required.
I don’t see anything in the above comments that lead me to believe the states of Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, Idaho, Oregon and Washington will agree to form any kind of a compact to run these trains. Who wants to explain that to the people of Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Missouri, California or North Carolina?
Or is the reverse now true – that we have acknowledged that trains fundamentally are a national concern to be dealt with by the federal government? If that is now the model, do we not owe it to the people of Illinois, etc., to relieve them of the burden they are bearing?
As I’m sure you know, NC DOT now owns most of the exx-Southern main line (roughly Greensboro/High Point down to Charlotte), and probably some CSX too. One solution to Amtraks getting bumped by freight – buy 'em out! And I’m guessing that most of the freight runs at night, like on the NEC. Is that the case, phoeb?
http://www.bytrain.org/corridor/stateowned.html
In 1988, the NCDOT purchased the former Southern Railway’s 67-mile Murphy Branch (part of which has since been purchased by the Great Smoky Mountains Railroad), setting the precedent for other acquisitions that followed. NCDOT now holds title to more than 100 miles of rail to be preserved for future use.
North Carolina Railroad, the remaining private shares of which were bought by NCDOT in 1998, ownes the corridor shown on that map in blue.
Built more than 150 years ago, this 317-mile corridor opened up the state to settlement and growth. . Today, freight trains operated by Norfolk Southern carry products into and out of the state. Amtrak runs eight passenger trains, including the Piedmont and the Carolinian, along its corridor. There are plans for regional mass transit operations along NCRR’s rails in several North Carolina metropolitan areas.
Last season,Amtrak had a package deal with the San Diego Chargers.One could take Amtrak to San Diego,take the trolley to the stadium,see the game,then return.