What is this? Gee, there are so informative…Not. If you are going to have a reveiw do a review. The reviews by Model Railroader are already suspect as it is. Reader reviews with no real substance are a waste of time.
I’ll assume you now feel better having stated your opinion. I don’t. I have no idea what you are talking about.
How about something a bit more informative and constructive. Cite examples of deficiencies or errors that you have noted and point them out with examples of how they are to be improved or corrected. Otherwise I will have to throw the challenge of adding “substance” back to you.
I don’t mean to sound churlish, but I would hope a fellow Canuck can enrich the forum with substantive contributions rather than vague complaints. Help us out, Bud! Let’s hear some specifics and deal with them.
-Crandell
Don–
I’ve only read several reader’s reviews (HO steam: Rivarossi Allegheny, Bachmann 2-8-4, Bowser 2-10-2) but I found those particular reviews full of some good information pertaining to those specific locomotives, both pro and con.
Tom [:)]
Don,
I guess the other thing you can do to combat the apparent deficiency is to write a review yourself that is informative. MR is asking readers for submissions.
Be part of the solution: http://www.trains.com/mrr/default.aspx?c=ssr&id=99
Tom