LC,
I understood this is a exercise in the hypothetical…
What I was looking for is the specifics of who is going to run the show in this experiment…
And I trying to point out that one man can not do it alone…you have to be able to find, recruit and motivate talent in key positions.
When my Dad retired from the Navy, he bought a wholesale hardware company.
One of his suppliers asked why he took as many fishing trips as he did,
because he would go off every couple of weeks for a weekend down at the coast, and the guy didnt understand how he could afford to do that.
My Dad’s answer makes a lot of sense to me, and I have applied to every business I have been involved in…
"I can’t understand a business owner or manager who is proud of having to work through his vacation…if he is a good business manager, he has hired and trained his people to the point he can afford to take a few weeks off, and be assured the business is still running quite well in his absence.
“A lousy manager tries to cut it so thin he cant afford to take a few days off, much less a vacation…that’s the guy who isn’t managing his business, its the other way around, the business is managing him”…
So, if you could get the number of investors, at the share price you stated, who would you have in mind for the key positions?
You were searching for those interested, just to see how many.
Well, I would be one of them, but this is part of the reason as many “short lines” seem to fade away as any other…they don’t hire the talent to run the business, they let the business dictate who they can hire.
Leadership starts at the top, and filters down…so who would you list in the prospectus as the top guys?
Ed