Ummm .... Please check your AI images beforehand 😉

Is it just me or…?

…will this Locomotive have problems going anywhere? I think there needs to be better communication between the marketing and editorial departments. :wink:

1 Like

Pilot training not what it used to be? Or am I missing something? (All possible puns intended!):rofl:

They are replacing previous human functions with AI now. Federal Government is behind everyone else and they just deployed Agentic AI, I have not even learned prompting AI yet completely. Agentic AI codes part of the application for you. Anthropic just released software two weeks ago call Claude…I think. It can code an entire application without human input. Which dropped the stock price of packaged software firms like Sales Force, Adobe, etc. (over reaction in my view).

So what I am saying is…good luck with that request. It might be something they will tell you, you need to live with.

It can be fixed though by training the AI with photos of American Trains and Diesel Locomotives. They got the steam train image probably because they let an untrained AI go out and search the internet without proper training (this is all my guess based on my rather limited experience).

Oh no, please tell me they didn’t…

Not a request, just hilarious.

The writing above was an example of the GIGO principle for SI?

While opening Christmas presents at my Daughters house around their Christmas tree, my SIL put some ‘Chirstmasy’ on line video that had numerous ‘steam’ engines in its nostalgic Christmasy scenes. One of those ‘locomotives’ really caught my attention - looked to be a 2-4-2, no biggy there, however the drivers were two different diameters with rods linking their motion together. Something didn’t add up in the AI creation of the illustration.

Since I’m not a steam buff…is it no tender for fuel, but passenger car following the loco? endmrw0204261750

1 Like

Bingo. Hard to get anywhere without fuel :wink:

I thought it was the wheels on the right side of the locomotive were resting on the left rail of the right track.

1 Like

It could be a tank engine, however, I don’t see the boiler being surrounded by the normal water jacket. Some form of a coal bunker could be at the back end of the crew cab.

1 Like

It’s funnier than that: look at the right wheel of the ‘lead truck’ and how far from the platform edge it is, relative to the drivers.

More important than fuel is water. You’d have to rig a tank under the following car, like the one used on a steam motor car. Not very likely!

The only way you could explain what’s going on at the drivers is to see the ‘rod’ as an outside valve-gear frame and that stuff above it as the original Franklin type B with the brackets holding the sections of the propeller shafts. I think the AI may have used French suburban engines with poppet-valve gear as some of the training material; that might explain the peculiar shape of the “steam chests”.

1 Like

Too closely coupled with the coach :wink:

Considering how feeble the AI-generated images have been as seen, I wonder why they should be posted here?

And that, right there, is why I sure don’t trust it!

Appears the drivers may be a bit underinflated as well!

1 Like

I saw that too. Go as far as the next switch or when the tracks spread out.

Maybe it’s dual gauge?

Or is it DUEL gauge? :wink:

2 Likes

there is that, but I note a lack of tender water too…and fear the inevitable crown sheet boom…

As I said, the water would have to be carried in tankage like that for steam motor cars. The problem for the “BS artists” is that motor cars generally used small-mass-flow boilers or steam generators… not comparatively large Stephenson-type as pictured (even assuming narrow firebox between driver pairs).

If you used liquid fuel as on motorcars, that tankage and associated firing equipment could be under the cars as well. Although you’d have to be a bit peculiar to build a train that way…