I have watched the movie Unstoppable numerous times as I find it entertaining. I know Hollywood uses artistic license freely, but something in this movie that gets to me is Frank stating that his SD40-2 has 5000 HP. Am I missing something? Was there ever a SD40-2 made with more than 3000 HP?
Assuming there wasn’t, why would they exaggerate that much? I suspect most of the viewing public wouldn’t know the difference anyway.
To the best of my knowledge all of the EMD 40 series diesel locomotives powered by the 645 V-16 engine–F, GP, SD, SDP, -2, T2,–all of them were 3000 traction horsepower. Remember, to get an additional 600 horses, EMD had to stretch the 645 to 20 cylinders in the SD-45.
The 5000 horsepower was just Hollywood BS. Enjoy the photography, ignore the dialogue.
I think the movie facts compared to the actual facts are even a little more loose . . . The runaway was an SD40-2, but I think the loco that chased it was an SD60. I’ve seen photos of the real-life conductor and engineer. They look kinda like Sam Sheppard and Vincent D’Onofrio and not Denzel Washington and Chris Pine. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Hollywood: based on a true story.
I would suppose that if they said 3,000 horsepower, most of the viewing public would not believe it. I mean, that is only 10 Ford Mustangs… a locomotive must be more powerful than 10 Ford Mustangs.
A lot of what gets said in movies is there to bring the audience into the picture, and even if the truth is accurate, but seems unrealistic, it might be an obstacle.
I wonder if, instead of a movie, this story appeared in book format, would the same misrepresentation have been made. Not to worry, H-wood lost me 40 years ago, and has continued to decline.
The thing that bugged me the most about that movie was when the diesels went up on the wheels of one side around a corner. I really had to throw my brain out the window for that scene.
For me, the biggest groaner in a train movies was in Dark Territory where the engine hood door were bullet-proof! However, I almost purposely avoid any train movies because the fantasy will be lost for me.
I have since seen that in several movies, where any stamped-steel door is impervious to projectiles.
I should also avoid crane movies. I cannot stand in when someone just jumps into a crane and starts operating it with no prior experience.
After 40 years as an aircraft mechanic, a railfan, a western history of the American west and, World War II student, H-wood has no place at my table. If I feel the need to experience the truly ridiculous, there’s always the Cartoon Network.
If the Hollywood types have become the national conscience figuring THEY know best how WE should live OUR lives, what kind of movies do you presume they are making? Now, these people who make their livelihoods pretending to be someone/thing they really are NOT, are getting into politics??? No thanks. They have nothing to say I want to hear, and my dollars are too precious to donate to them. I will leave this discussion at this point in order not to bring the wrath of the forum overseers down upon myself.
It’s still a good movie and all things considered the railroad scenes are pretty accurate.That scene going around the curve is silly, but most (all?) Hollywood movies are exaggerations of reality anyway.