I got do some train watching today. A BNSF southbound mixed train waited for a a northbound grainier at Hills, Minnesota. As soon as the northbound train passed, the southbound train dropped 'er in gear and took off. Literally, the southbound train was pulling onto the main in the time it took me to walk two blocks, and I’m a fast walker. Is it common for a train in the hole to take off as soon as the other train had cleared the switch?
It’s a function of how fast the train clears the switch, the safety time for clearance, the time to move the points and lock them, and the time to have the signal indicate ‘proceed’ to the train in the hole.
Slightly … sometimes not too slightly … complicating this, the train passing must actually clear the fouling point.
Fun thing observed early this week: light unit coal train stopped on the main, long PSR consist of empty autoracks going around on the siding. Engineer on the autorack train took special care slowing down not to bunch any slack – I said ‘watch him be 180’ too long when the engines get to the fouling point’ and, lo and behold! … first three cars, then one car, too long to clear. Some choice language from the westbound coal-train engineer; he is not a fan of some of the requirements of PTC or PSR. Finally the autorack moved up as close to the fouling point as he could, and the dispatcher authorized the coal train to move on discretion… I did not see how much clearance there was but it couldn’t have been much. Alternative was for the autorack to back up, run into the siding again, and nail the independent to run all the slack in right at the end – not my admittedly unprofessional idea of the best way to fit a long consist into the shortest space.
Here, the green showed within a few seconds of the autorack clearing the switch, not the fouling point, and presumably the coal train would have proceeded immediately upon this – he had his lights on and automatic brake released in anticipation of being able to do exactly that – had clearance permitted.
I will make the assumption that both the above situations you are illuminating happened on lines that operated under CTC rules that were controlled by a CADS.
CADS permits the Dispatcher to ‘stack’ signals to permit the switches and signals to be lined as the Dispatcher desires without the Dispatcher having to physically view and then manipulate the controls at that particular control point. CADS detects that the train has cleared the conflicting circuit(s) and it then issues the code line instructions to line the switches and signals as the Dispatcher had instructed CADS to do.
No signals are going to display Green, unless the fouling point of the conflicting route has been cleared by the conflicting train.
The worst words a Dispatcher can hear are ‘We don’t fit’ and his response is ‘What do you mean you don’t fit’. Since there is approximately 100 feet (+/-) of slack in the 10K+ foot long trains being operated these days - slack can be compressed to shorten the length of the train. CADS normally gets data from the carriers ‘car & train movement’ data system that contains the loads, empties, tonnage and length of the train (tonnage is calcuated from the cargo waybilled plus the UMLER specified empty weights of the equipment, length is calculated from the UMLER specified lengths of the cars consisted in the train). It is required that this consist information be updated to reflect the pickups and setoffs that occur between origin and desitnation of the train, that origin and destination can span a multitude of crew operating districts. Additionally some Defect Detector may report over the radio a length that the detector measured as the train passed the detector - Dispatchers may inquire of the crews what their DD length is.
The Siding Length
You don’t fit is happening quite frequently around the Deshler area on CSX.
stay safe
Joe
Re: Stacking.
I frequently watch the Deshler cams. On more than one occasion, I’ve seen one of the southbound signals go from “Stop” to “Restricting” almost as soon as the tail end of a train has passed it.
You can then watch as the signal cycles through progressively less restrictive aspects until it reaches “Clear.” All while the train that just passed moves further down the line.
I knew an engineer that did that in a yard.
He put 15 autoracks on the ground.
That is a stupid idea. Then what happens when the slack runs out? Your rear end goes back through the interlocking.
No it isn’t.
First, I take it the southbound was in the siding.
Second, I believe this is dark Track Warrant territory.
If it has authority to proceed after meeting the opposing train, once you’ve verified the train is complete (look for the EOT/marker) and clear of the switch, line the switch and go. If it’s a spring switch, you don’t even have to line it.
If it’s a hand throw in dark territory, or even in ABS territory, it either has to be lined back normal for main track movement or track warrant authority to leave it lined reverse. When authorized to leave it reversed, the train dispatcher becomes responsible for protecting it against other movements. Also for dark territory, a switch position awareness form needs to be filled out and intialled by the conductor and engineer when the switch is reversed and returned normal. Transfering control of the switch to another crew or dispatcher would also be notated. I don’t know about BNSF, but when we report clear of a warrant verbally, it has to be stated that all switches used have been restored normal within the limits (unless otherwise instructed) and the Conductor’s Trip Report (which is used as the SPAF) has been signed.
In ABS there is a 5 minute wait when operating a hand throw switch. However, one exception to the wait is after an opposing train has been met.
Jeff
And then you get suspended/fired for running a red light.
This is surprisingly common on CN, and we are allowed to request a signal out of the siding behind us and then wait until the Dispatcher tells us the request has cleared before releasing the brakes and attempting to start the train.
Holy cow! The internet gods let me sign on using my home computer for the first time in about a month!
Southbound was in the siding. The switch must be remotely controlled as the crew didn’t have to throw the switch. As soon as the train on the main passed, the conductor went back and checked something inside the 2nd engine. Right after he got back to the leading engine the train took off.
If there were not remotely contr
[quote user=“Murphy Siding”]
jeffhergert
First, I take it the southbound was in the siding.
Second, I believe this is dark Track Warrant territory.
If it has authority to proceed after meeting the opposing train, once you’ve verified the train is complete (look for the EOT/marker) and clear of the switch, line the switch and go. If it’s a spring switch, you don’t even have to line it.
If it’s a hand throw in dark territory, or even in ABS territory, it either has to be lined back normal for main track movement or track warrant authority to leave it lined reverse. When authorized to leave it reversed, the train dispatcher becomes responsible for protecting it against other movements. Also for dark territory, a switch position awareness form needs to be filled out and intialled by the conductor and engineer when the switch is reversed and returned normal. Transfering control of the switch to another crew or dispatcher would also be notated. I don’t know about BNSF, but when we report clear of a warrant verbally, it has to be stated that all switches used have been restored normal within the limits (unless otherwise instructed) and the Conductor’s Trip Report (which is used as the SPAF) has been signed.
In ABS there is a 5 minute wait when operating a hand throw switch. However, one exception to the wait is after an opposing train has been met.
Jeff
Holy cow! The internet gods let me sign on using my home computer for the first time in about a month!
Southbound was in the siding. The switch must be remotely controlled as the crew didn’t have to throw the switch. As soon as the train on the main passed, the conductor went back and checked something
Interesting. So it sounds like the southbound train in the siding is probably controlli radio controlled switches at both ends of the siding. If I follo this right, the dispatcher isn’t even involved? Is a message in some form sent to the dispatcher?
Dispatcher is involved in that he is the one that created the Track Warrants that set up the meet and gave the trains authority to operate beyond the meet. Nothing moves in TWC territory without the authority of the Train Dispatcher.
Marshall Sub (LS 197) is TWC/Dark with Hydraulic Spring switches (w/ radio tone call activation)…Boise City Sub here in SE Colorado is a similar operation and the spring switches pretty much do all the work . One direction is always lined into the siding and the other always holds the main. (At Hills, the main is 49 MPH and the siding is 40 mph)… the only times the tone call gets used is when something out of the ordinary happens and a switch needs to be thrown (usually the local roadswitcher)…operating with spring switches is going to warp Norris’ brain for a while. Usually those switches have manganese replaceable tips and undercut Sampson stock rails … they can almost handle the abuse (until some dim bulb pulls partially through the spring switch and then backs up[D)] …or takes the turnout too fast [D)][D)])
Norris: The hydraulic switch machine looks like a rectangular metal box (4’x3’x1’Thick with a green and red frogeye light on top that indicates if the switch is lined for the main track or siding)
UP has started having the dispatchers control the siding switches at some sidings. While the signals look like CTC, they aren’t. The switch and signals are considered to be manual interlockings. You need a track warrant to occupy the main track between stations and the main track between the siding switches, the manual interlockings.
One crew found this out the hard way. They had a warrant up to the interlocking, but it didn’t specify hold main track or clear main track at that station. The dispatcher lined them up down the main, gave them a signal but had not issued a track warrant to cover the move. They took the signal and went down the main to the interlocking at the other end of the siding.
Jeff
I haven’t heard of such a operation - to me - it sound fraught with confusion, confusion on the railroad can be deadly.
Such situations on CSX, happen in Signal Suspensions in CTC territory. To pass the entrance point of the Suspension you must have BOTH as signal indication more permissive than STOP and Track Warrant authority. Having one or the other is not sufficient to proceed. Crews have gotten it wrong and ended up with unpaid vacations.
“One crew found this out the hard way.”
Do you mean they were disciplined for proceeding down the main?
An unplanned, unpaid (unless they had job insurance) 30 day vacation.
Je
Cool! A brain teaser problem on a Monday! I think I follow what’s going on here.
Any train going south ends up automatically being switched into the siding at Hills. The switch snaps back(?) after train goes through, lining the switch for northbound trains on the main. When the southbound train leaves the siding, that switch snaps back too, leaving the switch lined for the northbound trains as well.
How’d I do? Now I have to come up with a reason to head back to Hills and look for frog eyed switch boxes. [:P]
I would guess that they don’t quite work that way, Murph. I would think the switch would stay in the preferred position until a train approaches it from the other track opposite of the switch points. The wheels of the train would force the switch points over, allowing the train to proceed through it. Anything coming from the point end would have to follow the alignment of the spring switch to whichever track it’s normally aligned for. In your case, the south switch would “snap back” after the southbound left the siding, but the north switch wouldn’t “snap back” until the northbound cleared it.