I’d have to say what ever the thing was I saw from south Africa a while back. It looked like a mutated UP Big Boy with bright red wheels and had a coal tender that was built onto the back of the cab. Yuck!..
The loco in the link you provided is a bloody beauty queen compared to the one I was referring to on my original post… I wish now I had paid more attention to what it was, but I was so overwhelmed with its ugliness that nothing else mattered at the time.
All steamers are bueatiful. in australia, where i live, there is this steamer called the 3801, that’s it’s number, if any of you are ever in australia i suguest that you go on it, i have been on it a couple of times.
Hmmm. Okay, i won’t try to weasel out and say “none”
In the “real world” I can’t think of any I truly dislike. The geared locos could be considered ugly on some bases: Shay, Heisler, Climax. Of course, they’re so ugly it’s cool and they’re my favorites.
In the model world, plenty to pick from, and strangely enough, the less they resemble the prototype, the uglier they are… I will start with my first-ever loco the Tyco “Chattanooga Choo Choo” 0-8-0 with tender drive. Blech.
I’m no fan of the myriad badly-done 0-4-0 “Docksiders” either (and in fact, wasn’t there only a very few of this prototype that ever existed? I think I remember reading something like the B&O had two docksiders once, and that was really it…???)
Ugly models, I could go on-and-on. Ugly prototypes… Nothing other than what I already said. I even rather like the “upside down bathtub” streamliners.
But… there is no such thing as an ugly steam loco. Some are more picturesque than others, but never was an ugly one. Some are a bit different like the Camelbacks, Old Mother Hubbards, and those cab forward giants, but it is the very thing that makes them things of beauty! Now diseasals… Those are UGLY!!!