Let’s say that the Y6b from PCM is the last word in Y class engines in HO scale. I think it is right up there with the Class A’s from BLI. If they were not so frigging expensive I would have ordered one already. But I got the Y3 from Proto and it does a good job. I may get another Y3 as if one isnt enough.
The only other Y6 Im familiar with is the old AHM ones from way back with the big flanges, the one I know of still runs very well under analog power and pulls fairly good. But the PCM Y6 is several generations ahead and is quite possibly the last word in good performaing engines.
Keep in mind that the Big Boy was made for the west but the Y’s were made to chain themselves to the mountains back east where it is all uphill, sideways and down with incredible tractive effort.
I have one. It is without a doubt my favorite locomotive. I also have three BB from PCM but to me atleast they do not give the same impression of brute force that the Y6b do. In other words, I love it and can really recomend it. It’s also more useful in my mind since it’s a little bit smaller and not as “UP” as the Big Boys are.
I have the Y6b and enjoy the running qualities of the model. It is not as detailed as I would have expected, but it has a great overall look. I replacee the orange headlight LED with one of the SMT/LED’s. That made a great difference in the appearance of the model.
It has the correct N&W whistle and they try to get the compound and simple sounds with a function switch. That function is less than great, but it is a must model for N&W fans, which is one of my favorite railroads in addtion to the Union Pacific and about ten others.
I like the weight of the model and the fact it does not use traction tires.
I don’t think I’ll be purchasing anything that large but I’m avoiding tight curves on my new layout just so I don’t have problems later on. What do I do with a scale mile of snap track?
Dave that was a cheap shot. I saw a old RR Y6b at K-10 the other day. Still like the BB better but, hum but. I would feel better if I had the Big Boy and it made it around my 1 POS 18’ turn.
(one last time the Athearns would take the POS 18" turn, first one pulled like if had a brick in the tender. Second one only derailed making left hand turns on a 26" turns! Took the 18" with no problems!!! Reason they went back was because of the Decoder’s!)
Talked with Bob at BLI and only problem they have had is the female plug in the tender. Seems if you push a little hard they break off. He said to use a little CV glue on the side of the plug and it would help a lot.
Hum, time to think some more. Like I need another engine anyway.[:D] Boy to think 8 months ago I swore I would never spend over $80.00 for a engine and I did not like DCC or sound.
I thought I remember reading a review of Proto’s Y-3 & it would lug like 100 cars without traction tires. I don’t have an engine from PCM (I didn’t win the sweepstakes they had. I do have the BLI Mountain with sound & I think it is way cool & also a decent puller. Please let us know all the juicy details when you get it.
Rivarossi also brought the Y6 out later with small flanges and the motor in the middle of the boiler instead of the cab like the AHM version was. It was/is a great pulling engine and although not as detailed as the PCM version, it still looks really sharp!
I Just got mine back from PCM after sending it back almost 3 months ago for a decoder programing issue…
It looks and runs good but I will say this…It does not pull 100+ cars that it was advertized to do.
Just the fact alone that the tender is cast metal it does weigh 12.4 ounces does not help with traction…I will however be reinstalling the 7 ounces of lead weight just to try to get it to pull 50-65 cars on the level.
It would have been nice to have a plastic tender with some kind of lead alloy cast for the loco frame and boiler.
Traction tires would help …they did this on the Reading T-1 and others.
The whistle is dead on and I also like the sounds of the injector overflow (which to me sounds like the engineer is taking a whiz) and the tender fill sound (which also sounds like someone flushing the toilet).
My point has and always be that if you have a space limitation on your layout that requires you to have tight curves, then you should purchase equipment that is designed to negotiate said curves. Buying oversized equipment and having them squeeze through tight corners is just asking for MR trouble. You see, thats what oversized flanges were for (Older Rivarossi)…todays nearer-to-scale flanges are not made to compensate for the tight curves.
DO YOU THINK your 'Big Boy’s multiple-wheeled ‘Buckeye’ tender could have been the problem? or (2) your use of ATLAS flex for your “26"r curve” could have had ‘kinks’ - tighter curves within the larger - causing the pilot truck problem?
WHY do I think this? - (1) When making small models, it is easy to make sightly off-center holes for pilot trucks.
(2) I had this very problem with my only ATLAS curve - (26"r) derailing my 4-4-2, and I don’t think you are more careful than I when laying curves.
CURE was to substitute (more expensive) SHINOHARA flextrack. When once bent it holds its shape. GONE were my ‘kink’ caused derailing problems.
FOR SOME REASON ‘forcing’ an engine around a too-tight a curve is a feeling of accomplishment for some, rather than a badge of ‘inexperience’.
This is NOT an accusation, but is meant as a Question based on personal experience. I had an expensive engine hit the follr once. Note the word “Once”, (not Twice).
because I handlaid track I would “cheat” the gauge wider on a curve.
When bending flex make sure you arent “narrowing” the gauge, flex with alternating connections would do this nasty. Your best flex will have one side solid connect rail the other side flexes for the curve.
Note the Rivarrosi equipment was designed to run on 18" radius. But go buy a brass EL-2 with accurate details and you must have 33" radius curves or it wont go. My Alco Brass EL-2 will take snap switches and snake thru them great. Thinking radius on my new layout has been a challenge for everything to fit and work. You have to think like how the railroad works and situate the needs accordingly. I will have track down to 15 inch for industrial sidings. Of course with trolley I’ll go down to 6 inch 8-D
We have all been thrown a curve on this issue which is fundamental for weeks and weeks now, if this is the best we can do beating this dead horse then I have a problem with it.
I plead the Mowhawk 4-8-2 thread as evidence as purity of topic tracking. I was hoping to learn as much I can about the Y6 from PCM but apparently we cannot escape getting sidetracked on the old tight curves problem. And Im sick of it.
I may be lucky, but my PCM Big Boy ran through 16" RAD curves with no problem. I thought the curve was 18 inch curves, untill a fellow cluber told me the curves was actually 16". I ran it slow, and did not de-rail once.
I don’t know about Dave B.'s, but my posting was definately humor-driven, based on some er, ah, “uniformed”? statements some have made in the past. I do have a small layout, but I also have a small budget. A BB in neither in my space or dollar range, though they are nice locos. I have an older N scale 2-8-8-2 which does negotiate the 11 curves. Even in its small scale, it is impressive!