On 12-2-10 BNSF issued General Notice 938 which reads in part:
The following “North American Cab” locomotives are not suitable for lead or
(crew) deadhead service:
Is this an absolute prohibition, such that if SD70ACe’s are the only units available, the train doesn’t ‘start’ / is cancelled or held until other power is available ? Or just a strong preference - “Use other units to lead whenever available ?”
Procedurally, how is this being implemented ? Timetable, General Rules, Bulletin, Memo from the Motive Power Bureau to the engine servicing facilities, etc. ?
With the SD70ACe’s being Train Control equipped engines CSX is using them as leaders on the I-95 corridor trains that must traverse the RF&P between DC & Richmond where Train Control leaders are required.
Three, they came in on a ferterlizer train for Mosaic…they load up and kick pretty good, but stop like a garbage truck…I like the 70M better, it kicks great and stops great.
We took the train out to Mosaic and spotted the plant with them, my engineer did not like how they shoved against a minimum brake set, he said he could not tell when the slack was all bunched in, and they didnt seem to set their independent brakes up as a trio, but each one by itself instead.
We took them back to north yard and stayed on them to finish our switching…they ride ok, but overall just dont seem to be the quality I expect from EMD.
So, Coborn, how many?
And besides the modelers club, / Historical group, what railroad do you work for?
Is it a Class 1, Class 2 or a Class 3?
And lastly, where did you get your information?
Was it a safety bulletin, general order, terminal order, what?
Because I have never known any Class 1 to give a hoot in a holler about the cormfort or ride quality for road crews…as long as the toiliet flushes, the heater sorta works and the lights all come on they could care less how it rides.
There’s a reasons they are known as “Thundercabs”.
I’ve ridden on plenty of those rattletraps. Just the issues with the cab doors popping open on their own should be enough to ban them from being leaders.
I don’t know anything about this issue, but from what I read, it sounds like the isolated cab was intended to cut down on noise. One source says:
“The analysis was used to identify standing wave resonances in the cab acoustic cavity and make modifications to the structure so that structural mode shapes do not correspond to the acoustical cavity mode shapes.”
Maybe they over thought the problem and came up with a cab design that was hard to build without rattles.
Oh yea, am I in a modelers club? I wasn’t aware. No. I am in a historical society? No. I dont know why you are being such a jerk about this. I never said it was set in stone, I merely said this is what I had heard about the PRE-isolated cab SD70ACe and M-2’s.
This sounds like the tail gate on a 1960 rattlin’ Rambler American station wagon I had as a kid.
New tie rods and ball joints this is not. Being ignorant myself of the problem in question, does anybody have any idea what it would take to fix. Does anybody have any idea what costs would be involved.
I’ve never had a problem with the SD70m engines. I know some guys I work with complain more about the rattling noise from cab components on the SD70ACe, and I guess they do a bit more than others. But I’ve had GE (desk top controls) that have had some good rattle to them too.
I’ve also had cab doors pop open, but on both EMD and GE engines. I’ve never kept a record of which is worse. A conductor asked me recently if I noticed some of the EMD engines assembled in Mexico are worse for the rattle issue than others. I hadn’t, he had I guess. Most of the time it’s just a minor annoyance, nothing to get too worked up over.
I would say, it seems if an EMD is going to have issues, they come with them while GE ones seem to age into theirs after a few years. I don’t know if it’s design, cheaper components, or cheaper manufacturing processes.