1976 letter to Railroad Magazine - Old Days on the CV I was delighted to read about the Central Vermont’s three Pacifics in the June Information Booth because I grew up with the CV and my father fired and ran its 230’s. I was actually standing among the people lined along the old cast-iron fence on Feb. 4, 1928, when the 232 posed for the photo you published. I was then 13 years old. It was a happy day for St. Albans, Vt., because this was the first train to run on the Northern Division after three months of reconstruction from the big flood of 1927. Among the dignitaries in the three-car train was Sir Henry Thornton, president of the Canadian National.
The flood damage had sent the CV into receivership. Prior to that CN had owned two-thirds of its stock, but the Central Vermont had been run pretty much by itself under the aegis of E.C. Smith, grandson of the founder. CV engines were painted in their own livery, which had no resemblance to the Canadian National’s. They bore the name Central Vermont on the side of the cab, with the engine number in larger figures on the sides and rear of the tender and in small digits on the sand dome, all lettering and numerals being white. The engines were painted a solid black, except for light gray smokeboxes and the white-rimmed wheels.
But to the dismay of onlookers, including myself, the 232 came down from the engine house and under the train shed painted - for the first time for any CV engine - in Canadian National livery. There were a gilded number on the side of the cab, a removable small number plate in white paint on the rear of the tender, no number at all on the sand
Thanks, Miningman. I can’t find much detail of Central Vermont Railroad’s The Washingtonian; the train shared the same name with a B&O Train which also hauled by 4-6-2s. I got more results for The Montrealer.
Interesting shots of the 230 and 231. With the front-end skirting and the smoke deflectors they look like a cross between the B&O’s “Lord Baltimore” and German steamers.
As I understand it that classic old train station just to the right of the train shed still exists, but that 1860’s train shed is certainly like the Old South from the 1860’s, “Gone With The Wind.”
It’s sad, but the fact is with railroading (or any other business) if something can’t earn it’s keep anymore it doesn’t hang around too long. From what I’ve read the roof of the train shed was rotten and the railroad just didn’t see any reason to replace it, so they tore the whole thing down. And I’ll bet they really had their hands full doing the demolition, the men who built that shed built it to last!
It would have been nice if they preserved the stabilized walls of the shed, you just don’t see brickwork like that anymore, but what are you gonna do?
Hey, here in Richmond the old C&O (now CSX) Fulton yard still had the old coaling tower still standing until about 15 years ago, and then it was gone overnight. Too bad, it was a nice monument to the steam era. Now you’d never even know it was there.
The train sheds would clearly be a impedement to today’s size of freight cars. Suspect the shed portals just barely clear Plate B cars, let alone anything larger.
Why on earth would you want to haul a freight car into a preserved building. There a a hundred other uses or just plain preservation as it was the last one in existence.
CV’s steam after 1927 was definitely CN in design. CV’s 4-8-2’s shared their odd front trucks with CN’s 6060, among others.
For those of us who watched CV stand out from the rest of New England railroads in the 1970s and 1980s there are a lot of fond memories of both black and red GPs and green and yellow RS11s, along with the “old scheme” S4 that switched White River Junction into the mid 1980s. CV’s willingness to take over and upgrade the Conn River line in 1987 probably saved both passenger and freight service in western NH and Vermont.
I’m beginning to think we could have a railroad “Poetry Corner”, with the first instalment being some of these clips and radio sessions intercut with a reading of “The Lay of the Lost Traveller”…
Since no-one else has said anything, I’m going to hazard a guess on why the outside bearing lead trucks on those locomotives.
Maybe for easier inspection and maintanance? At any rate there’s no reason I know of for one truck design to be any better than another, strictly builders and purchasers choice, although inside bearing lead trucks did seem to predominate.
And that was a neat video. Amazing, isn’t it? It doesn’t matter if the train says “Pennsylvania” or “New York Central” or “Amtrak” on its sides, there’s still something magic about fast-flying passenger trains.
“The Lay Of The Lost Traveler.” There was something familiar about that, so I looked it up. Well, I HAVE read it! Maybe in one of Lucius Beebe’s books. But just in case anyone else hasn’t, here it is…
East Alburgh is on a peninsula attached to Quebec and separated from Vermont and New York by water. The border crossing, about a mile from East Alburgh itself, has some kind of electronic inspection setup next to a side road. East Alburgh “station” near the bridge to Vermont has been a box car since at least the 1970s.
The Montrealer/Washingtonian used the St. Armand Sub north from Swanton to St. Jean until the late 1940s, when it was moved to the Rouses Point and Cantic subs.
Yes, it is sometimes referred to as an ‘Enclave’, separated from the main body of Lower 48, but it has 3 connecting road bridges so it is not entirely an Enclave.
Mike thinks Balt sees a tunnel.
I think Balt saw a tunnel, and it was sort of a short wide tunnel, for passenger trains.
Interesting old b&w film with a great shot passing by the St Albans train shed right at the start. Also some mining scenes up in Schefferville, also CNR and MEC trains.
Outside-bearing trucks have inherently better roll stability and generally have more room for lateral compliance devices. They were usually thought of as being more optimal for high speed, but were heavier (and had a somewhat larger effective polar moment of inertia) than typical inside-bearing trucks. To an extent this is also true for outside-bearing single-axle Bissel lead trucks vs. inside-bearing ones.
Actual tipover remains a consideration of gauge and load application height, so there is not a necessary advantage of outside- over inside-bearing trucks in that respect; my understanding is that a number of high-speed engines specifically used inside-bearing trucks with good suspension (e.g. Batz trucks) for the lower mass and polar moment of inertia. As a particular note, the arguably fastest locomotives built in the United States (outside the T1s) were the Milwaukee As, with a short wheelbase and inside-bearing lead truck; whether they would be measurably more stable or ‘ride better’ at high speed if they had had an outside-bearing truck remains an open question.
Overmod states: " I’m beginning to think we could have a railroad “Poetry Corner”, with the first instalment being some of these clips and radio sessions intercut with a reading of “The Lay of the Lost Traveller”…
Now that would be a project and a half. You first! Well worth it though.
Thanks for the poem Firelock and the mentioning of it by Overmod. Been years and years since I read that and it was a dim distant memory, now revived.
The poem puts you right there doesn’t it?
All those switching manouvers in Buffalo by the New York Central with over a hundred Pullman’s, Diners and Coaches involving 30 trains , all late night and in short order would be another good one, no radios though. Would have to use steam sounds switching, whistles, cars coupling and uncoupling and of course a new poem, involving our traveller who gets on the wrong car, or perhaps a switching error sends a car to Massena instead of Cleveland. In any case the woes of our traveller who wakes up somewhere not his destination.
Thanks for the explanation Overmod! Inside bearing vs. outside bearing, seems to me it amounts to “you pays your money and takes your choice,” no right or wrong, whatever you feel works for you. I can dig it.
Kind of like something I’m more familiar with, bolt action rifles. “Cock on opening” like a Mauser vs. “cock on closing” like an Enfield. No right or wrong, just different.
1937
